![]() It was important to listen more, and listen more often, throughout this evaluation. This happened through annual process evaluation activities as well as participation in important project moments such as A360’s annual reviews. © Population Services International What worked well within the A360 evaluation?Ĭlose engagement with implementors and donors to build a strong and trusting relationship: ![]() Read our summative report, and reports on each of these three components. Our overall findings from the evaluation are complex, presenting a mixed picture on the overall success of the programme. It was led by Population Services International (PSI) and co-funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation.įrom 2016-22, we collaborated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Avenir Health to lead a process evaluation, an outcome evaluation, and a cost-effectiveness analysis of the programme. ![]() The programme drew on six distinct disciplines, including human-centered design (HCD) and meaningful youth engagement, to develop novel, user-centred interventions to reach adolescent girls. Adolescents 360 (A360) was a four-year, US$31 million initiative to increase adolescent girls’ access to and demand for modern contraception in Nigeria, Ethiopia and Tanzania.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |